1. 1.5xIBH HOR shows 54.7% and previous report shows 38%. Its okay if these are accurate for this years stats but if its error in calc then I need assistance for sure.
Really want to avoid garbage in garbage out scenario for this report.
2. 2xIBL for HOR shows 31.6% vs 18.93% for previous report. Great if price is ACTUALLY moving this way currently but not great if its an error on my end.
3. 1.5xIBL for HOR shows 35.7% which seems in line with the previous 33.33% on previous report. Does that mean that the above stats are also accurate? That would mean price is moving that much differently then 2018 report. Only if all this is accurate though.... (garbage in garbage out)
4. PCL for HOR shows 40.2% and 2018 report shows 43.62%. Seems in line...
5. PMID shows 24.2% for current vs 25.93% for 2018 report. Also seems in line.
Numbers 1 and 2 above seem off due to discrepency from 2018 report. Please confirm if any error made in these.
The next values I will try to get are:
1. ONH OR ONL
2. ONH & ONL
3. IBH OR IBL
4. IBH & IBL
5. 1.5 IBH OR 1.5 IBL
6. 1.5 IBH & 1.5 IBL
7. 2x IBH OR 2x IBL
8. 2x IBH & 2x IBL
9. PHI OR PLO
10. PHI & PLO
11. PVAH OR PVAL
12. PVAH & PVAL
From that point, I think we can replicate for the 3 other scenarios.
1. The IBL and IBH % keep glitching and going to 100% on HOR scenario and went up to 106% on HIR scenario?
2. The ONL % for LIR breaking ONL during RTH session shows 107% and thats off?
3. The IBH % for LIR breaking IBH during RTH session shows 107% which is off?
4. The % for LOR scenario breaking ONL during RTH session shows 40.8% compared to 74.68% on 2018 report? Want to confirm that the syntax and whatever else is not in error...
5. Chad could you confirm that I did not erronously produce the wrong % for all 4 scenarious for the "Broken during RTH" stats. I will do the 4 scenarios for "Close Above" these key points if these are correct.
In each pane, make sure the elements HOR, HIR, LOR, LIR are at the very top of the element list (and at very top of the Info Box). That way, when opening the chart, those indicators will compute first, and then set their results into the C# ...which is then used by the other elements (for the percentage). That alone may fix most of your issues.
Another suggestion....just set the recalc frequency to "Minimal" and that will result in it only calculating these vallues once, when opening chart, and not continuing to waste resources recalcing every 3 seconds or whatever. Will make the chart very efficient...
OP < CL.1 AND OP >= LO.1 AND HI >= MPD_IBH AND LO <= MPD_IBH
So your IBH part is this...
HI >= MPD_IBH AND LO <= MPD_IBH
basically looking for the IBH to be somewhere within the range of the day....which obviously is going to be the case 100% of the time. If you are instead looking for the high of the day to have exceeded the IBH you need to change syntax to....
OP < CL.1 AND OP >= LO.1 AND HI > MPD_IBH
but the high is going to be >= the IBH 100% of the time. But it will not always be above (if the high was made during the IB)
1. I used this syntax for IBL:
OP < CL.1 AND OP >= LO.1 AND LO < MPD_IBL
2. LOR IBH shows 38.7% after correction but the previous report shows around 62%. probably another calc error?
3. Same thing with LOR IBL. It looks like its giving me the 62% less the % points to get to 100% if that makes sense. If that doesnt, I just mean that numbers look off.
4. Also changed the syntax for 1.5x IBH/IBL
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND HI > MPD_IBH+ .5 *(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND LO < MPD_IBL- .5 *(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
5. Also changed syntax for 2x IBH and IBL:
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND HI > MPD_IBH+(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND LO < MPD_IBL-(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
6. 2xIBH % for LOR shows 9.2% and previous report shows 17%.Its fine if I am doing this correctly but not good for final report if I am not.
Let me know If I missed anything on these.
I will have the "Close Above Statistics" shortly for HIR/HOR/LIR/LOR.
https://www.linnsoft.com/charts/cp-openstats-onh-onl-numberoff-es
It shows a 100% of the time in HOR scenario that price broke current days IBH. More accurate % would be around 64%.
https://www.linnsoft.com/charts/cp-openstats-onh-onl-numberoff-es
I'm showing 54.7% of the time on my end. Close and reopen the chart and see if that fixes.
I got 51.4% on my end. Could our amount of days settings be different therefore making the ending % slightly different?
https://www.linnsoft.com/charts/cp-openstats-onh-onl-numberoff-es
https://www.linnsoft.com/charts/cp-openstats-onh-onl-numberoff-es
1. 1.5xIBH HOR shows 54.7% and previous report shows 38%. Its okay if these are accurate for this years stats but if its error in calc then I need assistance for sure.
Really want to avoid garbage in garbage out scenario for this report.
2. 2xIBL for HOR shows 31.6% vs 18.93% for previous report. Great if price is ACTUALLY moving this way currently but not great if its an error on my end.
3. 1.5xIBL for HOR shows 35.7% which seems in line with the previous 33.33% on previous report. Does that mean that the above stats are also accurate? That would mean price is moving that much differently then 2018 report. Only if all this is accurate though.... (garbage in garbage out)
4. PCL for HOR shows 40.2% and 2018 report shows 43.62%. Seems in line...
5. PMID shows 24.2% for current vs 25.93% for 2018 report. Also seems in line.
Numbers 1 and 2 above seem off due to discrepency from 2018 report. Please confirm if any error made in these.
The next values I will try to get are:
1. ONH OR ONL
2. ONH & ONL
3. IBH OR IBL
4. IBH & IBL
5. 1.5 IBH OR 1.5 IBL
6. 1.5 IBH & 1.5 IBL
7. 2x IBH OR 2x IBL
8. 2x IBH & 2x IBL
9. PHI OR PLO
10. PHI & PLO
11. PVAH OR PVAL
12. PVAH & PVAL
From that point, I think we can replicate for the 3 other scenarios.
https://www.linnsoft.com/charts/cp-openstats-ibl-ibh-keepsshowi-es
1. The IBL and IBH % keep glitching and going to 100% on HOR scenario and went up to 106% on HIR scenario?
2. The ONL % for LIR breaking ONL during RTH session shows 107% and thats off?
3. The IBH % for LIR breaking IBH during RTH session shows 107% which is off?
4. The % for LOR scenario breaking ONL during RTH session shows 40.8% compared to 74.68% on 2018 report? Want to confirm that the syntax and whatever else is not in error...
5. Chad could you confirm that I did not erronously produce the wrong % for all 4 scenarious for the "Broken during RTH" stats. I will do the 4 scenarios for "Close Above" these key points if these are correct.
In each pane, make sure the elements HOR, HIR, LOR, LIR are at the very top of the element list (and at very top of the Info Box). That way, when opening the chart, those indicators will compute first, and then set their results into the C# ...which is then used by the other elements (for the percentage). That alone may fix most of your issues.
Another suggestion....just set the recalc frequency to "Minimal" and that will result in it only calculating these vallues once, when opening chart, and not continuing to waste resources recalcing every 3 seconds or whatever. Will make the chart very efficient...
So for your LIR_IBH signal, you're using...
OP < CL.1 AND OP >= LO.1 AND HI >= MPD_IBH AND LO <= MPD_IBH
So your IBH part is this...
HI >= MPD_IBH AND LO <= MPD_IBH
basically looking for the IBH to be somewhere within the range of the day....which obviously is going to be the case 100% of the time. If you are instead looking for the high of the day to have exceeded the IBH you need to change syntax to....
OP < CL.1 AND OP >= LO.1 AND HI > MPD_IBH
but the high is going to be >= the IBH 100% of the time. But it will not always be above (if the high was made during the IB)
1. ONH OR ONL
So let's consider doing HOR with (ONH OR ONL)...
Previously, we determined HOR with ONH was written as...
OP > HI.1 AND HI >= MPD_ONH AND LO <= MPD_ONH
And this part...
HI >= MPD_ONH AND LO <= MPD_ONH
is telling us it touched the ONH. To test for it to touch the ONL...
HI >= MPD_ONL AND LO <= MPD_ONL
And putting it all together....
OP > HI.1 AND ( (HI >= MPD_ONH AND LO <= MPD_ONH) OR (HI >= MPD_ONL AND LO <= MPD_ONL) )
2. ONH AND ONL
all we need here is to just change the OR to AND......
OP > HI.1 AND ( (HI >= MPD_ONH AND LO <= MPD_ONH) AND (HI >= MPD_ONL AND LO <= MPD_ONL) )
So you can then take this and apply it to your other AND/OR scenarios.
https://www.linnsoft.com/charts/cp-openstats-ibl-ibh-keepsshowi-es
1. I used this syntax for IBL:
OP < CL.1 AND OP >= LO.1 AND LO < MPD_IBL
2. LOR IBH shows 38.7% after correction but the previous report shows around 62%. probably another calc error?
3. Same thing with LOR IBL. It looks like its giving me the 62% less the % points to get to 100% if that makes sense. If that doesnt, I just mean that numbers look off.
4. Also changed the syntax for 1.5x IBH/IBL
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND HI > MPD_IBH+ .5 *(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND LO < MPD_IBL- .5 *(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
5. Also changed syntax for 2x IBH and IBL:
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND HI > MPD_IBH+(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
OP >= CL.1 AND OP <= HI.1 AND LO < MPD_IBL-(MPD_IBH-MPD_IBL)
6. 2xIBH % for LOR shows 9.2% and previous report shows 17%.Its fine if I am doing this correctly but not good for final report if I am not.
Let me know If I missed anything on these.
I will have the "Close Above Statistics" shortly for HIR/HOR/LIR/LOR.
Pages